Bed & Breakfast Regulation Changes
Several B&B owners are soliciting the city to change regulations that currently govern these businesses. Below are my thoughts and some of the comments I have gathered from citizens.
Email this discussion to a friend
Friday, May 26, 2006 | Posted by Joe Hertzler
(5) Comments | Filed under City of Williamsburg
B&B;’s were originally supposed to be for auxillary income, not primary. When someone trys to use them as a primary source of income, it becomes a very different endeavor.
Increasing the # or rooms increases the “commercialness” of the property. This then impacts those properties that abut.
Several B&B;’s have shown that their neighbors signed a petition saying they are OK with allowing expansion. It would be very difficult for a neighbor to say no, even if they don’t agree. People don’t want to seem unneighborly (is that a word?).
Increasing rooms limits runs contrary to desire to protect single family neighborhoods, which is a stated goal of the Comprehensive Plan.
If too large, it is a true inn. As such, move the business to where inns are allowed.
Takes houses that were originally residences into another market. Houses have enough push on them right now because they can be rented to students. The B&B;’s just add another level of pressure.
Cars coming and going at night will not enhance the quality of single family life in the houses beside them.
Q: Most, if not all, of the houses that have been converted to B&B;’s were originally built as single family houses. Traffic along these corridors has increased significantly since then. This makes them less desirable as SF housing. Isn’t the B&B;use an “adaptive re-use” of older buildings that might otherwise be allowed to deteriorate?
A: Keep them as single family. If we allow B&B;’s to expand, we are saying that these houses are no longer viable as SF. We will price and design them out of the market. Even if someone did want to live in one, they are not affordable.
Look at the example of Park Street in Charlottesville. It is a major corridor but it has remained well-maintained SF. It was teetering in the 60’s and 70’s, but people bought those houses and fixed them up.
Posted by | Friday, May 26, 4:34 pm